Court Rejects DSS Evidence in Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial Over Absence of Legal Representation
Abuja, Nigeria – May 30, 2025
In a significant development in the ongoing trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), the Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected key pieces of evidence presented by the Department of State Services (DSS). Justice James Omotosho ruled that the prosecution’s video recordings and written statements obtained from Kanu in 2015 are inadmissible due to the absence of his legal counsel during interrogation.
Court’s Rationale
The court emphasized that, despite the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015 using the term “may” regarding the presence of a lawyer during a suspect’s statement, the Supreme Court has consistently held that such presence is mandatory. Justice Omotosho stated, “The statements are inadmissible in light of this omission by the prosecution.”
Allegations of Duress
Kanu’s defense argued that the statements were made under duress, citing threats, solitary confinement, and lack of access to legal counsel. While the court found no evidence of coercion in the video recordings, it acknowledged Kanu’s repeated assertions about the absence of his lawyer during interrogations.
Prosecution’s Response
Following the court’s decision, the prosecution introduced new evidence, including a 2014 interview Kanu gave to Sahara Reporters. In the interview, Kanu made several controversial statements, including threats of violence if Biafra was not granted. The court admitted this interview as evidence, and it was played during the proceedings.
Next Steps
The trial is set to continue on June 13, 16, 18, and 19, 2025. The court’s rejection of the DSS evidence marks a pivotal moment in the case, potentially impacting the prosecution’s strategy moving forward.
Visual Coverage:
To enhance your blog post, consider embedding the following video, which provides a detailed report on the court’s ruling:
